DMRyan wrote:Is a downtown location on 4th Street really being contemplated for this? Hardly any of the Iowa cities seem to be able to actually convince these casino developers to build new facilities downtown. Dubuque has gotten the closest so far and Davenport sounds like it may be a pretty good bet too. No luck getting casinos as downtown development in Waterloo and Des Moines.
Mastermind wrote:Will the downtown Post Office be closing/downsizing ? That could be a good location.

siouxperland wrote:Mastermind wrote:Will the downtown Post Office be closing/downsizing ? That could be a good location.
No, it is not closing and it's not enough land by half anyway. There is some muttering of it going where the Perkins, Walgreens & old HOM furniture store is, parking on a few levels from the ground up with the casino & possibly hotel above that. Lots of crazy scenarios for downtown locations coming out. I say build the thing out off Singing Hills Blvd. and couple it with a hotel & conference resort that includes an indoor water park, etc. Stretch the property along the bluffs there with the casino complex on the north end and the resort on the south with direct access to Green Valley golf course.
I-29 is a little over a mile west. The 20/75 bypass is a mile north. Nearly a dozen other hotels/motels are within a couple of miles along Singing Hills and Lakeport Road. Will escape most of the confusion and interruption of I-29 construction which will paralyze downtown for 3 years. The land is owned by one entity so no fighting with holdouts, etc like downtown would bring. Offers tons of room for expansion and additional needs not yet seen. Golf course is directly south of property, could be reconfigured to start/end at the hotel conference center.
CJG wrote:I fear placing the casino and resort in this area (Singing Hills) will make it too hidden from view and take away from the full potential. This needs to be done right (not like this company's Perryville Hollywood Casino). The Perryville Casino looks like a prefab concrete building that has paint on it and signage. We need something that is glass, modern, and well-lit up at night. Something that will make people driving on I-29 say "there is a destination that I must stop at." It would help if it had the ability to have large conferences and shows to compete with whatever Sioux Falls may construct for their events center. For that reason alone it should be west of the Tyson Events Center or otherwise within walking distance and clearly within view of the interstate.
CJG wrote:I really hate to see this thing sprawl along the side of a bluff south of town. It needs to be downtown and visible and transformative for the city. Build up on the limited space available - don't sprawl. Singing Hills is nice for cars, Wal-Mart, fast food, and the old golf course. The new casino complex and hotel should centralized downtown. Perhaps some buildings come down to make room.
emjay12 wrote:I would love to see the casino actually reflect Sioux City.
Mastermind wrote:This doesnt mean you cant build up (downtown) rather than out.
siouxperland wrote:You're forgetting one thing... it's expensive building up versus out and this is not a high end Vegas style casino. The casino needs are about 90,000 square feet on one floor, which leaves the Warrior out. Besides, nobody is spending $20M of the $100M to do this project to try and bring an old relic up to code. For a point of reference, the empty Wal-Mart on Gordon is 87,000 square feet, that's just about what would be the casino alone. There isn't anywhere downtown you're going to sit that much space on one floor without knocking out blocks and blocks PLUS provide 1000 parking spots (minimum need).
CJG wrote:siouxperland wrote:You're forgetting one thing... it's expensive building up versus out and this is not a high end Vegas style casino. The casino needs are about 90,000 square feet on one floor, which leaves the Warrior out. Besides, nobody is spending $20M of the $100M to do this project to try and bring an old relic up to code. For a point of reference, the empty Wal-Mart on Gordon is 87,000 square feet, that's just about what would be the casino alone. There isn't anywhere downtown you're going to sit that much space on one floor without knocking out blocks and blocks PLUS provide 1000 parking spots (minimum need).
Yes. Let's convert the old Wal-Mart out on Gordon Drive. Lots of place for parking. Maybe Perkins will expand and stay open until 11:30. A new Quality Inn may get tossed in for good measure. Think small ... The SC way. If its going to be flat and done cheap, keep the boat IMO.
Why do you want the casino on one floor? The Borgotta in Jersey is a great model to use, it has multiple floors for the casino. A great hotel too. The Davis Brown building which is vertical was not cost prohibitive.
siouxperland wrote: It's going to be flat but it's not going to be cheap, the MRHD rejected a $100M proposal by Penn already. Like I said (and you keep failing to see), the MRHD wants a resort style casino like Grand Falls. Room for things not yet envisioned. It's not a project that will be built all at once, it will be built over time as things are found to be needed and Jersey casinos have nothing to do with midwest casinos, apples and oranges. Kansas City doesn't build vertical casinos. St. Louis doesn't build em. Council Bluffs doesn't build them. But Sioux City is supposed to somehow throw up some gleaming vertical palace to gaming?
CJG wrote:siouxperland wrote: It's going to be flat but it's not going to be cheap, the MRHD rejected a $100M proposal by Penn already. Like I said (and you keep failing to see), the MRHD wants a resort style casino like Grand Falls. Room for things not yet envisioned. It's not a project that will be built all at once, it will be built over time as things are found to be needed and Jersey casinos have nothing to do with midwest casinos, apples and oranges. Kansas City doesn't build vertical casinos. St. Louis doesn't build em. Council Bluffs doesn't build them. But Sioux City is supposed to somehow throw up some gleaming vertical palace to gaming?
Sorry for failing to see your vision for the project as the be all and end all. Glad you got it all figured out and planned for SC - typical of the city and its residents. I will leave this thread to you since there is no need to brainstorm or try to improve the concept beyond the one story, prefab, cheesy concept next to some golf course behind the local Wal-Mart.
emjay12 wrote:THEY WANT TO BUILT IT DOWNTOWN. If that does not work they will look for other areas to consider. They said they have one particular site in mind and a few others downtown as well. Any idea of where?
My thoughts are the Convention Center, or between Virginia and Court south of the railroad tracks and North of Gordon Drive. Help clean up that area. The scrap yards use to be there and I'm not sure what is in the other two buildings.
Here is a link to the story,
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/news/lo ... 6fc71.html
siouxperland wrote:It won't be downtown in the sense people think, they have a need of 1000 cars worth of surface parking (which MRHD has said is a minimal need). Think stockyards.
Mastermind wrote:siouxperland wrote:It won't be downtown in the sense people think, they have a need of 1000 cars worth of surface parking (which MRHD has said is a minimal need). Think stockyards.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but why does it have to be surface parking?
SiouxCity KCMO Man wrote:It would not surprise me to see parking structures put up to minimize the footprint of the area. It does cost more to put them up, but it also provides an amenity that winnavegas cannot provide. I can see the city assisting on this part of it.

Users browsing this forum: JMsioux and 0 guests