Official pros and cons of the two selected proposed intermodal sites. Site 1 is More or less the northern part of the (city owned) Mc-Graw hill lot up against the tracks.
Port Site (Site 1)
A. Pros
1. Less travel time from Chicago to DBQ to Waterloo using this site since don't need to switch rail lines
2. Port is more of an attraction today
3. Property is already owned by City
4. Involves only one rail carrier (CN)
5. Surrounding area is successfully developed so passengers may be more
comfortable disembarking from train
6. Closer to river for boats
7. Could free up City (McGraw-Hili) parking lot for future development
B. Cons
1. Paid parking may be low
2. Since there are known hazardous materials the cost of mitigation will increase the construction cost
3. FTA expressed a concern about pedestrians crossing at grade tracks to access site (and no rail gates are present to block sidewalk)
4. As a transit transfer point this site is inconvenient
5. Due to only one grade separation into Port area, it is difficult to have a predictable transit bus schedule
6. Less potential use by bicycles at this site
7. Shot Tower will not be visible from downtown or Port
C. Unknowns
1. SHPO response to FTA recommendation of No Adverse Impact
2. Written comments from the CN Railroad
3. Train signal protective requirements (related to total cost estimate)
4. Number of parking spaces which can be justified by demand, FTA recommends 500 as an upper limit
Historic Millwork Site (Site

A. Pros
1. Fills a need for parking in the Historic Millwork District
2. More reliable schedule for bus
3. More demand for bicycles, pedestrians. From downtown would not need to cross active railroad tracks
4. Walking distance from area where people do not have cars and who use intercity
carriers
5. Better location as a transit transfer facility
6. Site easy to access from US 61/151
7. Potential to provide a buffer between Historic Millwork District development and highway
8. Frees up opportunity for green space / plaza in the Millwork District
9. Millwork property owners endorse this site
10. Greater potential for parking revenue to offset costs making this site more self sufficient
11. Intermodal Facility is consistent with the Historic Millwork District with respect to sustainability, complete streets, air quality, and safety
B. Cons
1. Not all property needed is owned by City
2. Historic Millwork District is not developed, so more of a risk as to how successful it will be
3. Need to coordinate with two rail carriers to access site
4. Need to coordinate with the Iowa DOT since proposed use of their property
5. Requires Hwy ramp relocation and potentially Elm Street relocation
C. Unknowns
1. SHPO response to FTA recommendation of No Adverse Impact
2. Iowa DOT response to allowing the removal of the DOT frontage road (northbound) between 9th Street and Elm Street
3. Iowa DOT response concerning the use of the property currently owned by the DOT just west of US 61/151 and between 9th Street, 11th Street, & Elm Street
4. Iowa DOT concurrence of converting the existing one-way couplet of 9th Street and 11th Street to two-way streets
5. DNR response with respect to Phase II Hazardous Material Assessment
6. Number of parking spaces which can be justified by demand, FTA recommends 500 as an upper limit, however there is most likely more demand at Site 8